Equivalent plastic strain gradient plasticity with grain boundary hardening and comparison to discrete dislocation dynamics
E. Bayerschen, M. A. Stricker, S. Wulfinghoff, D. Weygand, T. Böhlke.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 471, 2184, (2015)
The gradient crystal plasticity framework of Wulfinghoff et al. (Wulfinghoff et al. 2013 Int. J. Plasticity 51, 33–46. (doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.07.001)), incorporating an equivalent plastic strain γeq and grain boundary (GB) yielding, is extended with GB hardening. By comparison to averaged results from many discrete dislocation dynamics (DDD) simulations of an aluminium-type tricrystal under tensile loading, the new hardening parameter of the continuum model is calibrated. Although the GBs in the discrete simulations are impenetrable, an infinite GB yield strength, corresponding to microhard GB conditions, is not applicable in the continuum model. A combination of a finite GB yield strength with an isotropic bulk Voce hardening relation alone also fails to model the plastic strain profiles obtained by DDD. Instead, a finite GB yield strength in combination with GB hardening depending on the equivalent plastic strain at the GBs is shown to give a better agreement to DDD results. The differences in the plastic strain profiles obtained in DDD simulations by using different orientations of the central grain could not be captured. This indicates that the misorientation-dependent elastic interaction of dislocations reaching over the GBs should also be included in the continuum model.
Keyword(s): grain boundary yielding, discrete dislocation dynamics, grain boundary hardening, strain gradient plasticity
Cite as: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2015.0388